logo
  • Home
  • Curriculum
  • Services
  • Fee Schedule
  • Fingerprinting
  • Resource Center
  • FAQ
  • Instructors
  • Contact Us
Product was added to your cart

Cart

Pro-Gun Members of Congress Seek to Protect Veterans

July 6, 2017Francesca RiveraLaw

U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) and U.S. Representative David P. Roe (R-TN) this week introduced bills to create a 180-day amnesty period for veterans or their family members to register historic war mementos that would be considered regulated firearms under the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Pending as S. 1435 and H.R. 3054, both of these bills would apply to items acquired overseas before October 31, 1968. This legislation would allow for the lawful possession and transfer of historically significant armaments and protect veterans from potential criminal liability for purely technical violations of the law that do not endanger public safety.

Members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving overseas in combat zones have over the years brought home a variety of mementos from their deployments. In some cases, these have included captured firearms of the type that require registration and the payment of a special tax under the NFA. Such legal technicalities, however, were presumably not foremost on the minds of the brave young service persons who had survived the ordeal of war and simply wanted to resume their normal lives in America.

Over the years these firearms have sat harmlessly idle in untold numbers of attics, basements, and barns. For the veterans who owned them and their families, however, these relics represent potent reminders of freedom’s heavy cost.

The NFA normally requires firearms to be registered at their time of their manufacture or transfer. Private possession of unregistered firearms is illegal. Congress passed legislation in 1968 that granted a brief, limited amnesty period to register war trophies, but with the primitive means of communication available at the time, most veterans were unaware of that opportunity or learned too late to take advantage of it. This left very few options for lawful preservation of the affected firearms. Even relatives or heirs who discover these firearms and wish to dispossess themselves of them could face criminal prosecution for their possession.

Read More

Tags: Concealed Carry, Firearm Laws, Second Amendment

Related Articles

Federal Court Holds Ban on Interstate Transfer of Handguns Unconstitutional

February 15, 2018Francesca Rivera

Gun advocate questions constitutionality of Morrison’s pending legislation

July 5, 2018Francesca Rivera

Pierre looking at ordinance for private security to carry weapons after concealed carry law change

July 22, 2019Francesca Rivera

Navigation

  • Home
  • Curriculum
  • Services
  • Fee Schedule
  • Fingerprinting
  • Resource Center
  • FAQ
  • Instructors
  • Contact Us
© 2017 Illinois Concealed Carry Training Classes
Managed by: CyberOptik
Cleantalk Pixel